Digital Natives and AI: What Higher Ed Can Learn from Gen Z
How can higher ed engage digital natives and cultivate AI fluency at the same time? Conor and Finn Grennan share insights for the next generation of learners.
Marketing Strategies
Your enrollment marketing strategy must change because the next generation of students is researching, comparing, and making decisions long before many institutions know they are interested.
For enrollment and marketing teams already managing tight budgets, ambitious goals, staff capacity issues, and constant technological change, that can feel like one more moving target.
You are being asked to personalize more communication, respond faster, produce more content, understand AI, improve yield, and somehow connect all the data flowing through your systems.
Meanwhile, prospective students keep changing how they search.
The 2026 Enrollment Engagement Report gives us one of the clearest pictures yet of what that change looks like.
Sponsored in part by Caylor Solutions, the report draws on responses from more than 2,800 high school juniors and seniors actively navigating the college search.
Fifty-three percent of students reported applying or requesting information without any previous direct interaction with an institution.
Sixty-three percent said generic outreach makes them less interested in a college.
Eighty-three percent are more likely to take the next step when communication feels personalized.
Nearly half, 47%, already use AI tools during their college search, while 60% report a more negative perception of a college when institutional communication feels AI-generated.
Those may sound like separate trends.
I think they tell one larger story.
A future-ready enrollment marketing strategy has to connect the moments students experience before inquiry, after inquiry, across digital channels, and eventually through a meaningful relationship with the people at your institution.
That is where the new rules of enrollment begin.
A: A future-proof enrollment marketing strategy connects anonymous student research, personalized communication, AI-supported insights, and human relationships into one coordinated engagement journey.
Key findings from the 2026 Enrollment Engagement Report show why:
For colleges, the opportunity is to understand student intent earlier, make communication more relevant, use AI to support staff, and reserve meaningful moments for genuine human connection.
For decades, enrollment systems were built around a fairly predictable event.
A student raised their hand.
They filled out an inquiry form.
They registered for a visit.
They met your admissions counselor at a college fair.
They responded to a campaign.
Once that happened, the institution knew who they were and could begin recruiting them.
According to the report, 53% of students applied or requested information without any previous direct interaction with the institution.
They did not suddenly become interested when they filled out that form.
They had already been researching.
They may have explored academic programs, watched student videos, compared financial aid information, searched Reddit, followed your social accounts, checked career outcomes, read reviews, asked an AI tool about your school, or returned to your website several times.
From your institution’s perspective, they were invisible.
From the student’s perspective, the relationship had already started.
Capture Higher Ed refers to this hidden portion of the journey as the “dark funnel.”
I have also written about this shift in What Stealth Applicants Reveal About Enrollment Marketing, because stealth behavior is quickly becoming part of normal student search behavior rather than an unusual exception.
That distinction matters.
Your website, content, organic search presence, student stories, social channels, video, program pages, affordability information, and digital advertising are already doing recruitment work before admissions knows the student’s name.
For many institutions, that means marketing carries more responsibility earlier in the journey than it did even a few years ago.
Your prospective students are forming opinions while they are still anonymous.
The question is whether the experiences you give them during that invisible phase help them move closer to you.
Start by looking at the content students consume before inquiry.
Which academic program pages attract the most prospective student traffic?
Where are students spending time on your financial aid pages?
Which student stories or videos receive sustained engagement?
What questions are bringing visitors to your site through organic search?
Where do visitors repeatedly return?
Then trace where those experiences lead.
A student researching nursing should be able to move naturally from the nursing program to faculty, clinical experiences, student stories, career outcomes, affordability information, campus life, visit opportunities, and an appropriate next step.
They should not have to reconstruct your institution from a collection of disconnected webpages.
That is the first new rule.
The enrollment journey starts before you can see it.
The personalization findings in the Enrollment Engagement Report may be even more important than the stealth-applicant number.
Sixty-three percent of students said generic outreach makes them less interested in a college.
Eighty-three percent said they are more likely to take the next step when outreach feels personalized.
And 40% expect personalized outreach before they ever submit a form.
Think about that last number for a moment.
Students increasingly expect relevance before they have formally introduced themselves.
Higher education did not create that expectation.
The rest of their digital lives did.
McKinsey found that 71% of consumers expect companies to provide personalized interactions, while 76% become frustrated when those interactions are not relevant.
“Consumers now view personalization as the default standard for engagement.”
-McKinsey & Company
Your institution probably does not have the technology budget of Amazon, Netflix, or Spotify.
Most colleges I work with certainly do not.
But the lesson is still useful.
Personalization has become part of the way people evaluate whether an organization understands them.
For colleges, personalization does not have to mean an elaborate technology stack.
And it should mean more than inserting a student’s first name into an email.
If someone repeatedly explores your engineering program, show them useful engineering content.
If someone is spending time on scholarships and financial aid, help them understand affordability.
If an admitted student has already visited campus, stop sending introductory visit messages and move them toward the next meaningful step.
If a parent is worried about career outcomes, give them evidence that speaks directly to that concern.
The principle is simple.
Use what you know to become more helpful.
Personalization should be built into your enrollment marketing strategy rather than added as a clever layer after a student inquires.
When it works, students feel understood.
When it fails, they feel like another name in a campaign.
The report tells us they are increasingly willing to respond accordingly.
Personalization sounds simple until you look at where the information actually lives.
Your website knows one thing about the student.
Your CRM knows something else.
Your email platform tracks another set of behaviors.
Your digital advertising platforms collect their own signals.
Admissions counselors have notes.
Event systems track registrations.
Social platforms capture engagement.
Financial aid may have information that marketing never sees.
Every system owns a small piece of the student’s story.
They do not care that marketing uses one platform and admissions uses another.
They do not know that your website team cannot see the same information as your CRM team.
They simply notice when your institution appears not to remember them.
That is why a disconnected data environment often creates a disconnected enrollment marketing strategy.
Colleges have more data than ever.
What many lack is a practical way to turn those signals into better decisions.
You do not need to solve every data challenge before you can improve the experience.
Those questions usually reveal plenty of opportunities.
Your enrollment marketing strategy becomes more useful when your systems help people understand what has already happened and determine what should happen next.
The Enrollment Engagement Report also reveals an interesting tension around artificial intelligence.
Students are using it.
They just do not necessarily want institutions using it on them.
Forty-seven percent of the students surveyed said they use AI tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini during their college search.
At the same time, 60% said they have a more negative perception of a college when its messaging feels AI-generated.
One in three dislikes the idea of communicating with an AI agent.
Additional findings highlighted in my article about AI in college admissions outreach show that 83% of students would rather receive answers from a real person.
This creates a useful boundary for colleges.
AI can help your team spot engagement patterns, summarize a student’s previous interactions before an admissions counselor reaches out, and surface common questions that deserve a response.
For marketing teams, it can speed up first drafts, repurpose strong student stories across multiple channels, and reduce the time spent sorting through large amounts of data.
For admissions counselors, it can help prioritize follow-up and provide useful context before a conversation begins.
Used this way, AI becomes less of a front-facing replacement for human interaction and more of a behind-the-scenes tool that helps your team respond with greater relevance and care.
Those are meaningful improvements for teams already stretched thin.
I have seen the pressure many higher ed teams are working under.
They do not need technology that gives them one more system to manage.
The goal should be to make your people more informed, more prepared, and more available for the conversations where a student needs another human being.
Students are making a significant financial and personal decision.
There will always be moments when efficiency matters.
There will also be moments when a student needs someone who can listen, understand the context, and respond with judgment and empathy.
Your enrollment marketing strategy should know the difference.
Higher ed marketing teams naturally organize work into campaigns like a…
There is nothing wrong with campaigns.
They help teams plan work, allocate resources, and measure performance.
A student searches for your biology program late at night.
A parent checks tuition the next morning.
The student watches a dorm tour between classes.
They ask ChatGPT how your program compares with another institution.
They follow one of your students on Instagram.
They open an email.
They attend an online information session.
They come to campus.
They speak with a faculty member.
They ignore three emails and then suddenly text their admissions counselor with an important question.
Each interaction adds something to their perception of your school.
That requires a change in the questions we ask.
Instead of only asking what communication goes out next Tuesday, ask what the student needs next based on what they have already experienced.
Instead of asking whether the email campaign performed well in isolation, ask whether it helped students move to the next meaningful interaction.
Instead of measuring channels independently, examine the journey connecting them.
This is where personalization and data become genuinely useful.
They help you determine which moment should come next.
Technology is going to get better.
AI will get better.
Behavioral intelligence will improve.
Personalization will become easier to scale.
The temptation will be to automate more of the enrollment journey simply because we can.
The report gives us a reason to be thoughtful about that.
Students want relevance.
They expect responsiveness.
They appreciate institutions that understand their interests.
But they also remain sensitive to communication that feels artificial.
That is not a contradiction.
The strongest enrollment marketing strategy uses technology to make human interactions more informed and valuable.
Imagine an admissions counselor preparing to speak with a prospective student.
The counselor can see that the student has repeatedly explored biology, spent considerable time looking at financial aid, watched a campus video, and registered for an upcoming event.
That counselor does not need to begin with a cold script.
They can begin closer to what the student actually cares about.
That conversation feels personal because the institution has paid attention.
You may not have the advertising budget of the largest institution in your market.
You may not have a huge enrollment staff.
You may not have every new technology platform.
But you can know your mission-fit students well.
You can communicate clearly.
You can create a digital journey that answers their real questions.
And perhaps more importantly, you can put the right person into that relationship at the right moment.
Those are things small colleges can do very well.
This is where all the findings from The Enrollment Engagement Report come together.
The 53% stealth finding tells us that meaningful engagement is happening earlier than many institutions can see.
The 63% generic outreach finding tells us that communication has to become more relevant.
The 83% personalization finding tells us that relevance can move students toward action.
The AI findings tell us technology is becoming part of the student search, while human trust continues to matter.
The answer is not a better stealth-applicant campaign.
It is not a personalization campaign.
It is not an AI campaign.
It is a connected student engagement journey.
Your content attracts and educates students while they are anonymous.
Your website helps them explore fit.
Your behavioral data provides clues about what matters to them.
Your CRM preserves the relationship once they identify themselves.
Your communication reflects their interests.
AI helps your team work more intelligently.
And your admissions staff enters at the moments where a human relationship can make the greatest difference.
Each part supports the next.
That is very different from purchasing technology and hoping the technology creates a strategy for you.
Strategy has to come first.
Once you understand the journey you want to create, you can determine which tools, workflows, content, and people are needed to support it.
I have spent enough years in higher education marketing to know that every new trend comes with pressure to react quickly.
There is always another platform.
Another tool.
Another channel.
Another piece of technology promising to transform enrollment.
For already overworked teams, keeping up can become exhausting.
The Enrollment Engagement Report gives us something more useful than another list of tools.
It gives us a clearer picture of student behavior.
Students are researching before we know who they are.
They expect communication to reflect what matters to them.
They are incorporating AI into their own decision-making.
And they still value human relationships, especially with an educational choice like this when trust matters more than ever.
Start by mapping the journey you already have.
Look for the places where students disappear.
Identify communication that remains generic even when you know more about the student.
Find data that exists but never reaches the people who could use it.
Decide where AI can reduce repetitive work or improve insight.
Protect the moments that deserve human attention.
Then improve one connection at a time.
You do not have to rebuild your entire enrollment operation tomorrow.
You do need to recognize that the traditional funnel is becoming harder to see.
Students have already changed how they search for colleges.
Our enrollment marketing strategy has to catch up.
Build a Stronger Enrollment Marketing Strategy Around the Student
A future-ready enrollment marketing strategy requires more than better emails, another CRM feature, or the latest AI tool.
It requires understanding how students move from anonymous research to meaningful engagement and eventually to enrollment.
At Caylor Solutions, we help colleges look across that entire journey.
Through our Enrollment Assessments, Marketing Audits & Recommendations, CRM Consulting, Strategic Consulting, and Tactical Execution services, we help institutions identify gaps, connect systems, improve communication, and build stronger engagement experiences around mission-fit students.
That work can include examining how your website supports enrollment, how your marketing and admissions teams share information, how personalization fits into communication, where AI can support your team, and where human contact can have the greatest impact.
The goal is a connected journey where your content attracts the right students, your data helps you understand them, your technology supports the relationship, and your people know when to step in.
If your current enrollment marketing strategy still depends on students raising their hands before meaningful engagement begins, this is a good time to rethink the journey.
Caylor Solutions can help you connect the moments that increasingly shape where mission-fit students enroll.
Contact us today and let’s talk about how we can help you future-proof your enrollment strategy.
The essential marketing literacy guide every higher education leader needs! If you are a higher education leader seeking the clarity to evaluate strategy, challenge assumptions, and lead with confidence through disruption, “Know What You Don’t Know” is your guide.
So you can “trust, but verify” your marketing decisions, avoid costly mistakes, and lead your institution with the strategic clarity and courage needed to thrive in this new era.
Ready to lead with confidence?
Order now!
Images via chatgpt.com
Subscribe to The Higher Ed Marketer podcast today!