From Listening to Action: Higher Ed Strategic Planning People Actually Own
Discover how higher ed strategic planning starts with listening, builds trust, and turns institutional feedback into meaningful, shared goals.
Branding
A strong college differentiation strategy is becoming essential as institutions face shrinking student populations, growing financial pressure, and increased competition for enrollment.
For years, colleges have known the demographic decline was coming. The numbers have been available. The warnings have been repeated.
And yet, many institutions are still responding with familiar tactics: increase advertising, expand the recruiting territory, offer more financial aid, or launch another enrollment campaign.
I understand why.
When your incoming class is smaller than expected and the budget depends on tuition revenue, you need results.
But I think there’s an important lesson in how some institutions are responding to these pressures.
A recent video examining the enrollment cliff highlights Bowling Green State University in Ohio, where university leaders took a different approach.
Instead of waiting for demographic trends to dictate their future, they examined what made their institution valuable, where opportunities existed, and how they could strengthen their position in the market.
Are you giving students a compelling reason to choose your institution, or are you simply working harder to get their attention?
A: A college differentiation strategy identifies the distinctive strengths, experiences, and outcomes that make an institution especially valuable to particular students. It connects institutional mission, academic offerings, student experience, and market demand with clear enrollment messaging. Effective differentiation requires colleges to understand the students they are best equipped to serve, demonstrate meaningful advantages, and communicate those advantages consistently. During the enrollment cliff, colleges can strengthen their competitive position by examining their existing assets, identifying student needs, developing credible points of distinction, and using those strengths to guide both institutional planning and recruitment. For smaller private colleges, this approach can help limited marketing resources work harder while attracting students who are more likely to find the institution a good fit.
The demographic challenge facing higher education is real.
According to the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education’s Knocking at the College Door report, the number of U.S. high school graduates was projected to peak in 2025 and decline approximately 13% by 2041.
The effects will vary significantly by region. Some states will see much steeper declines, while others may experience growth.
For a tuition-dependent private college in the Midwest or Northeast, those projections deserve serious attention.
Fewer prospective students can mean fewer applications, more competition for the same students, and increasing pressure to offer additional institutional aid.
And the economics can get uncomfortable quickly.
In the video, Harvard economist David Deming explains that discounting tuition to attract more students can become a dangerous strategy because colleges have substantial fixed costs.
Your residence halls, academic buildings, technology systems, and administrative expenses don’t automatically become less expensive when enrollment declines.
If you lower the price substantially to fill seats, you may bring in more students without generating enough net tuition revenue to support the institution.
That doesn’t mean financial aid strategies are inherently wrong. Affordability matters, and thoughtful pricing can help the right students enroll.
But price alone is a difficult foundation for long-term differentiation.
When several colleges offer similar programs, similar experiences, and similar messaging, students have fewer meaningful reasons to prefer one institution over another.
Price becomes an easy way to compare otherwise indistinguishable options.
A well-developed college differentiation strategy gives students something more substantial to consider.
Bowling Green State University offers an interesting example because its leaders recognized the demographic challenge before it fully reached higher education.
President Rodney Rogers describes studying enrollment projections and asking how the university could distinguish itself.
In the video, Rogers observes that higher education institutions are often poor at differentiation.
That’s an important admission from a university president.
Bowling Green began by examining its institutional strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. It then made deliberate decisions about academic programs and the educational experience it wanted to offer.
For example, the university strengthened its aviation programs in response to anticipated demand for pilots. It also developed forensic science offerings connected to a crime laboratory on campus.
These were strategic choices connected to institutional assets and opportunities.
And the results are worth noticing.
According to a September 2026 announcement from BGSU, the institution reported 20,799 students in fall 2026, representing its fourth consecutive year of overall enrollment growth.
The university also reported strong retention and improvements in graduation outcomes.
Of course, we shouldn’t assume that its differentiation decisions alone caused those results. Enrollment performance reflects many factors.
But there is a lesson here that smaller institutions can apply.
Bowling Green worked to strengthen the actual experience and opportunities it could offer students.
That gave its enrollment and marketing efforts something meaningful to communicate.
One of the most interesting parts of Rogers’ comments concerns Bowling Green’s position between two familiar types of institutions.
It isn’t a major flagship university, and it isn’t a small private college.
That middle position could have been viewed as a competitive disadvantage.
Instead, Rogers and his colleagues considered how it might become a strength.
They focused on an institution large enough to offer substantial opportunities but accessible enough for students to become actively involved.
Think about how that idea could apply to a smaller private college.
You may not have the research budget of a flagship university. You probably don’t offer hundreds of academic programs. Your athletics facilities may be modest, and your campus might be located in a community that prospective students have never heard of.
But perhaps first-year students work directly with faculty on meaningful projects.
Perhaps your nursing students have access to clinical experiences that are difficult to obtain elsewhere.
Maybe your business students regularly work with local entrepreneurs, or your education majors spend substantial time in classrooms before student teaching.
Those experiences can become compelling reasons for the right students to choose your institution.
The key is being specific.
There’s a considerable difference between telling students they’ll receive personal attention and showing them what that attention looks like during their first semester.
One sounds like a promise almost any college could make.
The other helps a prospective student imagine a particular educational experience.
I find Bowling Green’s willingness to reconsider its market position especially valuable.
Colleges spend a lot of time comparing themselves to competitors.
We examine their programs, scholarships, facilities, tuition, rankings, athletic offerings, and marketing campaigns.
Competitive analysis has its place. You need to understand the choices students are considering.
But there’s a danger in treating every difference as something you need to correct.
Consider a small college in a rural community.
Someone on the leadership team may assume that its location is a disadvantage because students want access to a larger city.
For some students, that’s probably true.
Other students may value a quieter environment, stronger relationships, access to outdoor recreation, or opportunities to take on leadership responsibilities that might be harder to find at a larger institution.
Your rural location doesn’t automatically make your college desirable.
But it may create a distinctive experience for a particular group of students.
The same could be true of your religious identity, academic specialization, campus size, institutional history, or close relationship with a particular industry.
In an earlier Caylor Solutions article about higher ed differentiation at Grace College, I explored how institutional mission, location, and community relationships can become meaningful elements of a college’s identity.
The broader lesson is that your institution doesn’t need to resemble every competitor to be valuable.
It needs to understand what it offers, whom those advantages benefit, and how to communicate them credibly.
Sometimes that requires leadership to stop apologizing for characteristics that the right students may actually appreciate.
Differentiation sounds good in a strategic planning meeting.
Turning it into something useful for admissions and marketing requires more work.
If I were sitting down with a small college’s marketing and enrollment team, I’d start with a simple exercise.
Bring together people from marketing, admissions, academic affairs, student life, and institutional research.
Ask each department to identify three things the institution does especially well.
Then challenge the group to provide evidence.
If someone says faculty mentorship is a strength, what supports that claim?
Can you show how often students interact with professors? Are there meaningful research or professional opportunities? Can students describe how those relationships have helped them?
If your college claims excellent career preparation, can you demonstrate internships, employer relationships, graduate placements, licensure results, or other relevant outcomes?
You’re looking for observable experiences and credible evidence.
A familiar marketing phrase becomes much stronger when students can see what it means.
Not every institutional advantage matters equally to every student.
A highly structured academic environment may appeal to one group and discourage another.
A strong faith commitment may be a primary reason one family chooses your institution, while another family may prefer a different environment.
A specialized academic program may draw students from well beyond your traditional recruiting territory.
This is where mission-fit thinking becomes valuable.
Study your successful students and graduates. Look for patterns in their interests, goals, backgrounds, and reasons for choosing your college.
Interview current students about the expectations they had before enrolling and the experiences that confirmed their decision.
Ask recent alumni what prepared them especially well for life after graduation.
You can also learn from students who choose not to enroll.
What did they misunderstand? What did they value at another institution? Was the issue affordability, academic fit, location, or something else?
Those conversations help distinguish what your institution wants to promote from what prospective students actually value.
For additional guidance, I recently discussed finding mission-fit students where they actually are.
Once you know what makes your college distinctive and who values those qualities, examine your messaging.
Suppose your website says:
“Our college offers experiential learning opportunities in a supportive academic environment.”
That’s pleasant language, but it doesn’t tell students very much.
Imagine instead that your college could truthfully say:
“Business students work with local companies on real projects, gaining experience presenting recommendations to business owners before graduation.”
Now a prospective student has something concrete to consider.
The goal isn’t to make every message longer.
It’s to make your message more meaningful.
Review your homepage, academic program pages, admissions emails, digital advertising, and campus visit presentations.
Do they communicate recognizable student benefits?
Or could you replace your institution’s name with a competitor’s without changing much of the copy?
That simple test can reveal how much room there is for improvement.
You don’t necessarily need a major rebranding campaign to begin.
Select one academic program or prospective-student audience.
Develop messaging around a credible institutional strength and create a focused landing page, email sequence, or digital advertising test.
Compare the results with your existing approach.
Look beyond clicks and impressions.
Are the right students inquiring? Are they visiting campus? Do inquiries become applications, and do applications become enrolled students?
When possible, follow those students through retention and academic progress.
A differentiation strategy should ultimately help your college attract students who understand what they’re choosing and have a meaningful opportunity to succeed there.
There’s another lesson from Bowling Green that I don’t want higher education leaders to overlook.
Rogers wasn’t simply describing how the university marketed its existing programs.
He was describing institutional decisions about which programs to develop and what kind of educational experience the university wanted to provide.
That distinction matters.
Too often, marketing departments are brought into the conversation after important decisions have already been made.
A new program is approved, and marketing is asked to generate applications.
Enrollment targets are increased, and the admissions team is told to fill the funnel.
Leadership decides to enter a new recruiting market, and the marketing team is asked to create a campaign.
Sometimes those decisions are well supported. Other times, the institution hasn’t adequately considered what students actually want or how the offering compares with alternatives.
They’re listening to prospective students and parents.
They’re seeing which programs attract interest, which questions create hesitation, and where students disappear during the recruitment process.
They can observe how families compare institutions and whether your distinctive strengths are influencing their choices.
Those insights belong in strategic planning discussions.
For example, if prospective students repeatedly express interest in a particular career pathway, that information could prompt academic leadership to examine whether existing programs and partnerships are meeting the demand.
If families regularly misunderstand financial aid, the institution may need clearer communication and a better experience rather than an entirely different pricing model.
If students appreciate your campus community during visits but cannot understand its value from the website, the marketing team has identified a communication problem worth addressing.
None of this means marketing should dictate academic priorities.
Faculty, academic leaders, and institutional leadership have responsibilities that extend far beyond recruitment.
But decisions improve when the people responsible for understanding prospective students are part of the conversation.
A college differentiation strategy works best when marketing, enrollment, and institutional leadership are working from the same understanding of who the college serves and why students choose it.
I know many smaller institutions don’t have the resources to conduct extensive market research or redesign their entire enrollment operation.
Fortunately, you can begin with three questions.
Be specific. Consider faculty access, distinctive programs, campus culture, community partnerships, practical learning, and measurable outcomes.
Avoid relying on attributes that every competitor claims.
Look at current students, successful graduates, recent applicants, and the people who consistently respond well to your institution.
Don’t assume your traditional recruiting audience is necessarily your best opportunity for the future.
Review student interviews, admissions conversations, website engagement, campus visit feedback, application patterns, and enrollment results.
If you can’t identify supporting evidence, you may have found an assumption that deserves testing.
I would encourage your marketing and enrollment team to bring these questions into its next planning meeting.
Choose one promising strength, one student audience, and one meaningful way to improve your communication.
Then measure what happens.
That modest effort may reveal a more productive opportunity than launching another broad campaign.
Bowling Green State University’s experience doesn’t mean every institution can grow its way out of demographic decline.
Different colleges face very different financial circumstances, geographic pressures, and institutional constraints.
Some will need to make difficult decisions about programs, costs, partnerships, and long-term sustainability.
But I think the example offers a helpful reminder.
Colleges have more choices than simply raising their marketing budgets or offering deeper tuition discounts.
They can examine their strengths more carefully. They can better understand what students value. They can improve the experiences that make their institutions worth choosing. And they can communicate those strengths with greater clarity.
A clear institutional identity, a compelling educational experience, and a disciplined approach to attracting mission-fit students can create an advantage that a larger advertising budget cannot easily reproduce.
The enrollment cliff is going to challenge higher education for years to come.
The institutions that respond thoughtfully will need to make difficult decisions, strengthen what they do best, and become increasingly clear about the students they’re equipped to serve.
That’s where a meaningful college differentiation strategy begins.
Is Your College Communicating What Makes It Different?
If your institution is struggling to stand out, I would encourage you to look beyond your latest marketing campaign.
Are your institutional strengths clear? Do your website and recruitment materials demonstrate their value? Are you investing in channels that reach the right prospective students?
At Caylor Solutions, our Marketing Audit & Recommendations service helps colleges and universities evaluate their marketing effectiveness, messaging, competitive positioning, and opportunities for improvement.
We can help you identify where your institution’s distinctive value is getting lost and develop practical recommendations for reaching the students most likely to recognize it.
Let’s talk about how Caylor Solutions can help your institution stand out.
Then it’s time to look beyond the same crowded marketing channels everyone else is using. That’s why we want to share our new ebook: 25 Watering Holes No One Has Told You About.
With this practical guide, you’ll discover how to:
In short, you’ll gain a fresh roadmap for connecting with the right students—long before they ever fill out an application. Download your free ebook today!
images via chatgpt.com
Subscribe to The Higher Ed Marketer podcast today!